Let's see. Grozny is a city in Russia. Kinda makes sense that the Russians might have an interest in rebuilding it. Mosul? It was destroyed because of Islamic savagery there. Someday Islam might take it upon itself to eliminate barbaric Muslim savages. Until that fine day arrives, expect more cities destroyed and more children slaughtered. And, until that fine day arrives, Muslims know better than to try to rebuild their destroyed cities.Sertorio wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:47 amGrozny during the war against Russia
Grozny as it is now, after the Russian government helped to rebuild it
Is this propaganda? Probably yes, but the facts remain. Chechens suffered during the war and have it now a lot better than they ever had. When will the "good guys" - the US - rebuild Iraqi and Syrian cities in the same manner?...
Mosul after the "good guys" liberated it
When will the US start rebuilding Mosul?...
Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
Re: Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
Yeah. That's right. Why would anybody want to spend money rebuilding Mosul? Knowing Muslims, they will soon destroy it again.Jim the Moron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:07 am
Let's see. Grozny is a city in Russia. Kinda makes sense that the Russians might have an interest in rebuilding it. Mosul? It was destroyed because of Islamic savagery there. Someday Islam might take it upon itself to eliminate barbaric Muslim savages. Until that fine day arrives, expect more cities destroyed and more children slaughtered. And, until that fine day arrives, Muslims know better than to try to rebuild their destroyed cities.
Re: Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
Mosul was destroyed by savages, but not Muslim ones, just western ones riding planes...Jim the Moron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:07 amGrozny is a city in Russia. Kinda makes sense that the Russians might have an interest in rebuilding it. Mosul? It was destroyed because of Islamic savagery there. Someday Islam might take it upon itself to eliminate barbaric Muslim savages. Until that fine day arrives, expect more cities destroyed and more children slaughtered. And, until that fine day arrives, Muslims know better than to try to rebuild their destroyed cities.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
ISIS had nothing to do with it, right?Sertorio wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:48 amMosul was destroyed by savages, but not Muslim ones, just western ones riding planes...Jim the Moron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:07 amGrozny is a city in Russia. Kinda makes sense that the Russians might have an interest in rebuilding it. Mosul? It was destroyed because of Islamic savagery there. Someday Islam might take it upon itself to eliminate barbaric Muslim savages. Until that fine day arrives, expect more cities destroyed and more children slaughtered. And, until that fine day arrives, Muslims know better than to try to rebuild their destroyed cities.
Re: Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
ISIS was occupying Mosul and therefore had no reason to destroy it. The American led coalition were the ones wanting to dislodge ISIS, and they couldn't care less about the destruction which would ensue from such attempt. They were the savages and have no intention to rebuild what they destroyed.Jim the Moron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 8:21 amISIS had nothing to do with it, right?Sertorio wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 7:48 amMosul was destroyed by savages, but not Muslim ones, just western ones riding planes...Jim the Moron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:07 amGrozny is a city in Russia. Kinda makes sense that the Russians might have an interest in rebuilding it. Mosul? It was destroyed because of Islamic savagery there. Someday Islam might take it upon itself to eliminate barbaric Muslim savages. Until that fine day arrives, expect more cities destroyed and more children slaughtered. And, until that fine day arrives, Muslims know better than to try to rebuild their destroyed cities.
-
- Posts: 1148
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm
Re: Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
"ISIS was occupying Mosul and therefore had no reason to destroy it."
Then why did they destroy so much of the city?
Then why did they destroy so much of the city?
Re: Trump has Putin over a barrel (of oil)
They didn't. The coalition did, to dislodge them. Although I guess that once the street by street fight started, ISIS fire contributed to the destruction.Jim the Moron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 9:11 am"ISIS was occupying Mosul and therefore had no reason to destroy it."
Then why did they destroy so much of the city?
Re: try telling this to Islamophobes.
JIM: you failed to mention that the soldiers who retook Mosul from the "barbaric Muslim savage" were themselves Muslims. Was your omission intended to misinform readers to the effect that it was some indeterminate sort of non-Muslims, possibly Americans, who rescued Mosul from ISIS?Jim the Moron wrote: ↑Mon Feb 12, 2018 6:07 amMosul? It was destroyed because of Islamic savagery there. Someday Islam might take it upon itself to eliminate barbaric Muslim savages. Until that fine day arrives, expect more cities destroyed and more children slaughtered. And, until that fine day arrives, Muslims know better than to try to rebuild their destroyed cities.
Last edited by neverfail on Mon Feb 12, 2018 1:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: burn down the barn to get rid of the rats?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 53591.html
ISIS made bloody sure that non combatant civilians in Mosul stayed where they were during the fighting and distributed their fighters among them for the purpose (apart from compulsory creating more martyrs for Allah) of maximising civilian casualties from both Iraqi firepower and coalition bombing. Anyone who now condemns either force for unavoidable loss of civilian life is therefore an ISIS dupe doing that evil movement's work.
Wake up!
ISIS made bloody sure that non combatant civilians in Mosul stayed where they were during the fighting and distributed their fighters among them for the purpose (apart from compulsory creating more martyrs for Allah) of maximising civilian casualties from both Iraqi firepower and coalition bombing. Anyone who now condemns either force for unavoidable loss of civilian life is therefore an ISIS dupe doing that evil movement's work.
Wake up!