Tulsi Gabbard

Discussion of current events
User avatar
Doc
Posts: 3574
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Fri Oct 18, 2019 2:25 pm

Sertorio wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:37 am
Doc wrote:
Thu Oct 17, 2019 11:17 am
And still Americans do not seem to want to have someone like her as POTUS. I wonder why...
You misunderstand very much. Many who would have voted for Bernie had not he been cheated out of the Democrat nomination voted for Trump. For the same reason Hillary is attacking Tulsi as Tulsi isn't writing off the votes of half the voting population like Hillary and her syncopates do.
“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 3574
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Fri Oct 18, 2019 2:43 pm

Tulsi responds



“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1657
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:03 am

Having read the interchange on line and then the Fox news TV accounts, I got curious on how CNN would handle this. Instead of duplicating the entire exchange, Don Lemon severely cut Rep Gabbard's comments, and brought on a couple of other mouth-breathing anti-Gabbard operatives.

But give CNN some credit. Some time later Van Jones came on in support of Rep Gabbard.

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 3574
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:17 am

Jim the Moron wrote:
Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:03 am
Having read the interchange on line and then the Fox news TV accounts, I got curious on how CNN would handle this. Instead of duplicating the entire exchange, Don Lemon severely cut Rep Gabbard's comments, and brought on a couple of other mouth-breathing anti-Gabbard operatives.

But give CNN some credit. Some time later Van Jones came on in support of Rep Gabbard.
The way I see it Gabbard now has a real chance to win the nomination. She is an agent of change inside a democratic party there very seriously needs an intervention.

This is what I see the Democrat Party has become:



Gabbard is one of the few sane people left outside of the extremely manipulative Clinton Machine.

What you are seeing on CNN is an entire network that is part of that machine with some exceptions like Van Jones.

Just to show how bad it is I had my account on Twitter suspended last night by syncopates of that machine for counting them as they came to Hillary's defense claiming that "All the evidence shows Gabbard is a Russian agent" or similar things. Not that Twitter suspended my account but past experience is that a lot of people reported my account as a spam bot. and Twitter's anti-spam bot automatically suspends the account in question. To Twitter's credit they immediately restored my account after I sent them an email. That plus someone I have never encountered before demanding I tell them my real name. Presumably so they could check to see if I was another "russian"

Which was one of the accusations HIllary's machine was pushing That anyone that was taking Gabbard's side in this" is proof that what Hillary said that Gabbard is a russian." And "the same russian bots that were attacking Harris" Which is the same tactic they have been using against Trump.

Attacking a major in the US Army like this is absolutely despicable. The Reaction to her smears against Gabbard may convince Hillary not to run but I doubt it.

But if you like Gabbard hope that Hillary runs. If Hillary does run hope that Gabbard's body guards are really good at what they do.

“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 2987
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Sertorio » Sat Oct 19, 2019 9:30 am

Will Americans wake up to the fact that Tulsi is as good as she sounds, and that she would make a very different type of President? An honest President!...

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1657
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Sat Oct 19, 2019 11:22 am

As Doc stated weeks ago, the fix is in.

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 3574
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Sat Oct 19, 2019 4:43 pm

Personally I don't like his sport announcer style, but otherwise Goodman knows what he is talking about

Hope springs eternal



"Hillary does not claim Warren is a Russian agent"

Besides Warren and an ailing Bernie Gabbard is the only serious candidate left. I hope she shreds Hillary. I do believe that is exactly what is going to happen. Someone that gets a security clearance the hard way is a hard target.

From the rest: The ten little democrats:

“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 3574
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Sat Oct 19, 2019 5:01 pm

Seems at least one never Trumpster thinks Gabbard is a Russian asset:

“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 2987
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Sertorio » Sun Oct 27, 2019 2:44 pm

Tulsi Nails it on National TV… US Regime-Change Wars
by Finian Cunningham - October 18, 2019

No wonder Democratic Party bosses and mainstream media are trying to bury presidential contender Tulsi Gabbard. She is the only candidate, perhaps the only politician in the US, who is telling the American public exactly what they need to know about what their government and military are really up to: fighting illegal regime-change wars, and to boot, sponsoring terrorists for that purpose.

It didn’t come much clearer nor more explicit than when Gabbard fired up the Democratic TV debate this week. It was billed as the biggest televised presidential debate ever, and the Hawaii Representative told some prime-time home-truths to the nation:

“Donald Trump has blood of the Kurds on his hands, but so do many of the politicians in our country from both parties who have supported this ongoing regime-change war in Syria that started in 2011… along with many in the mainstream media who have been championing and cheer-leading this regime-change war.”

The 38-year-old military veteran went on to denounce how the US has sponsored Al Qaeda terrorists for its objective of overthrowing the government in Damascus.

It was a remarkably damning assessment of US policy in Syria and elsewhere in the Middle East. And it was by no means the first time that Gabbard has leveled with the American people on the brutality and criminality of Washington’s so-called “interventions”.

The other 11 Democratic candidates on the stage during the TV debate looked agog after Gabbard’s devastating and calmly delivered statement. All the others have proffered the false narrative that US forces are in Syria to “fight terrorism”. They deplore Trump’s announcement last week to pull back US troops from northeast Syria because, they say, it will undermine the fight against Islamic State (IS or ISIS) and other Al Qaeda affiliates. They also condemn Trump for “betraying Kurdish allies” by his partial troop withdrawal.

President Donald Trump talks about “ending endless wars” and “bringing our troops home”. But he still premises his views on a credulous belief that the US under his watch “defeated ISIS 100 per cent”. In that way, he essentially shares the same corny view as the Democrats and media that America is a force for good, that it is the “good guys wearing white hats riding into the sunset”.

On the other hand, Gabbard stands alone in telling the American people the plain and awful truth. US policy is the fundamental problem. Ending its regime-change war in Syria and elsewhere and ending its diabolical collusion with terror groups is the way to bring peace to the Middle East and to spare ordinary Americans from the economic disaster of spiraling war debts. American citizens need to know the truth about the horror their government, military, media and politicians have inflicted not just on countries in the Middle East, but also from the horrendous boomerang consequences of this criminal policy on the lives and livelihoods of ordinary Americans, including millions of veterans destroyed by injuries, trauma, suicide, and drug abuse.

Following the TV debate this week, it seems that Gabbard won the popular vote with her truth-telling. A major online poll by the Drudge Report found that she stole a march on all the other candidates, winning approval from nearly 40 per cent of voters. Top ticket candidates Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders and Joe Biden were trailing behind with 7 per cent or less.

Gabbard has clearly struck a deep chord with the US public in her honest depiction of American wars.

Despite her shattering exposé and seeming appreciation by the public, most mainstream media tried to bury her after the TV debate. Outlets like Vox and CNN declared that Warren was the winner of the debate, whose talking points were mainly about domestic policy issues. Like the other candidates, Warren plies the propaganda narrative of US forces “fighting terrorism”. Vox even slated Gabbard as “a loser” in the debate and claimed she had made “blatantly false” statements about the US’ role in Syria.

Other mainstream news outlets chose to ignore reporting on Gabbard’s demolishing of the official propaganda about American wars. Earlier this week, CNN and the New York Times smeared her as a “Russian asset” and an “apologist for Assad”, referencing a visit she made to Syria in 2017 when she held talks with President Assad.

The Democratic National Committee is claiming that Gabbard does not have sufficient support in polls it deems worthy for her to qualify for appearing in the next TV debate in November.

International events, however, are proving the Hawaii Representative right. US troops, as with other NATO forces, have been occupying Syrian territory illegally. They have no mandate from the United Nations Security Council. The pullback of US troops by Trump has created a vacuum in northeast Syria into which the Syrian Arab Army is quickly moving to reclaim the territory which US-backed Kurdish fighters had de facto annexed for the past five years. Several reports show the local people are joyfully welcoming the arrival of the Syrian army. The scenes are reminiscent of when Syrian and Russian forces liberated Aleppo and other cities previously besieged by terror groups.

America’s war machine must get out of Syria for the sake of restoring peace to that war-torn country. Not because “they have defeated ISIS 100 per cent”, as Trump would conceitedly claim, nor because “we are betraying Kurds in the fight against terrorism”, as most Democrats and US media preposterously claim.

Peace will come to Syria and the Middle East when Washington finally ends its criminal regime-change wars and its support for terrorist proxies. Tulsi Gabbard seems to be the only politician with the intelligence and integrity to tell Americans the truth.

https://www.strategic-culture.org/news/ ... ange-wars/
Will Americans start listening to her? Or do they prefer listening to the CNN and reading the New York Times?...

neverfail
Posts: 4333
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2016 3:47 am
Location: Singapore

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by neverfail » Mon Oct 28, 2019 12:00 am

Doc wrote:
Fri Oct 18, 2019 2:25 pm
You misunderstand very much. Many who would have voted for Bernie had not he been cheated out of the Democrat nomination voted for Trump.
Out of sheer disgust at the Democrats Party?

Post Reply