RFK Jr

Discussion of current events
Post Reply
User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 12533
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: RFK Jr

Post by Sertorio » Tue May 09, 2023 3:12 am

‘Brutal’ poll reveals the truth about Joe Biden
By Ben Domenech - May 8, 2023 | 11:31 am


The latest poll from the Washington Post and ABC News sent shockwaves through America’s media commentariat over the weekend, with numbers that are absolutely dire for President Biden. “This poll is just brutal”, announced former Democratic spokesperson turned ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos. He’s correct: with approval ratings at just 36 percent, and lagging far behind Donald Trump and Ron DeSantis in potential general election matchups, the voting numbers are terrible. But the personal ratings are somehow even worse than that — 68 percent of those polled, including 48 percent of Democrats, believe Biden is too old for another term. And just 32 percent think he has the mental acuity to serve as president — including 69 percent of Independents.

Image

Image

If Democrats have any brains, they will choose RFK Jr...

User avatar
cassowary
Posts: 9000
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 11:30 pm

Re: RFK Jr

Post by cassowary » Tue May 09, 2023 4:34 am

Sertorio wrote:
Tue May 09, 2023 3:12 am

If Democrats have any brains, they will choose RFK Jr...
But they don’t have brains. That’s why they are democrats. Anyway, polls show Biden ahead of Kennedy.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 690888002/#
The Imp :D

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 12533
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: RFK Jr

Post by Sertorio » Tue May 09, 2023 5:38 am

Hugh Hewitt: Expect An LBJ 1968 Withdrawal From Biden Next Year
by Ian Schwartz - May 8, 2023
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... _year.html

Hugh Hewitt on Monday told 'Special Report' host Bret Baier he expects President Joe Biden to exit the presidential race like President Lyndon B. Johnson did in 1968. LBJ announced in March of 1968 that he would not seek another term.

"Gallup came in at 38% approval. So the ABC/Washington Post poll at 36 does not sound like an outlier. You got the money quote. It's the one I have written down. I have a hell of a lot of wisdom and I know more than the majority of people. That's not how one runs for the presidency. And I ask myself what does General Secretary Xi, what does Vladimir Putin, what does the Ayatollah Khomeini think about Joe Biden and I think they think he is infirm because that's what I see and that's what I hear. And I think the American people coming to the recognition he really can't do this," Hewitt said.

"I'm expecting an LBJ '68 exit sometime next year," Hewitt said.

"You are?" Baier asked.

"Yes," he said. "I don't think he can do it. I don't think his wife is going to let him do it and his friends certainly should be counseling him not to do it."
And then there will be RFK Jr...

User avatar
SteveFoerster
Posts: 5924
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:17 pm
Location: Probably DCA or DOM
Contact:

Re: RFK Jr

Post by SteveFoerster » Tue May 09, 2023 6:02 am

Sertorio wrote:
Tue May 09, 2023 5:38 am
Hugh Hewitt: Expect An LBJ 1968 Withdrawal From Biden Next Year
by Ian Schwartz - May 8, 2023
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... _year.html

Hugh Hewitt on Monday told 'Special Report' host Bret Baier he expects President Joe Biden to exit the presidential race like President Lyndon B. Johnson did in 1968. LBJ announced in March of 1968 that he would not seek another term.

"Gallup came in at 38% approval. So the ABC/Washington Post poll at 36 does not sound like an outlier. You got the money quote. It's the one I have written down. I have a hell of a lot of wisdom and I know more than the majority of people. That's not how one runs for the presidency. And I ask myself what does General Secretary Xi, what does Vladimir Putin, what does the Ayatollah Khomeini think about Joe Biden and I think they think he is infirm because that's what I see and that's what I hear. And I think the American people coming to the recognition he really can't do this," Hewitt said.

"I'm expecting an LBJ '68 exit sometime next year," Hewitt said.

"You are?" Baier asked.

"Yes," he said. "I don't think he can do it. I don't think his wife is going to let him do it and his friends certainly should be counseling him not to do it."
And then there will be RFK Jr...
I'd point out your mistake of taking commentary on Fox News seriously, but you've made it abundantly clear that you couldn't care less about the credibility of what you post so long as it says something you want to believe.

Image
Writer, technologist, educator, gadfly.
President of New World University: https://newworld.ac

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 12533
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: RFK Jr

Post by Sertorio » Tue May 09, 2023 9:33 am

SteveFoerster wrote:
Tue May 09, 2023 6:02 am
Sertorio wrote:
Tue May 09, 2023 5:38 am
Hugh Hewitt: Expect An LBJ 1968 Withdrawal From Biden Next Year
by Ian Schwartz - May 8, 2023
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... _year.html

Hugh Hewitt on Monday told 'Special Report' host Bret Baier he expects President Joe Biden to exit the presidential race like President Lyndon B. Johnson did in 1968. LBJ announced in March of 1968 that he would not seek another term.

"Gallup came in at 38% approval. So the ABC/Washington Post poll at 36 does not sound like an outlier. You got the money quote. It's the one I have written down. I have a hell of a lot of wisdom and I know more than the majority of people. That's not how one runs for the presidency. And I ask myself what does General Secretary Xi, what does Vladimir Putin, what does the Ayatollah Khomeini think about Joe Biden and I think they think he is infirm because that's what I see and that's what I hear. And I think the American people coming to the recognition he really can't do this," Hewitt said.

"I'm expecting an LBJ '68 exit sometime next year," Hewitt said.

"You are?" Baier asked.

"Yes," he said. "I don't think he can do it. I don't think his wife is going to let him do it and his friends certainly should be counseling him not to do it."
And then there will be RFK Jr...
I'd point out your mistake of taking commentary on Fox News seriously, but you've made it abundantly clear that you couldn't care less about the credibility of what you post so long as it says something you want to believe.

Image
Fox News? The quoted poll was carried out by ABC/Washington Post...

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 12533
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: RFK Jr

Post by Sertorio » Sun May 28, 2023 3:47 am

Why I believe RFK Jr. will be the 2024 Democratic nominee
BY DOUGLAS MACKINNON - 05/27/23 12:00 PM ET
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/40 ... c-nominee/

If the shocking 2016 presidential election of Donald J. Trump taught us anything, it should be that voters can still be unpredictable and unpollable, and that millions of them believe that the entrenched elites from both political parties no longer hear their voices or speak for them.

Voters are continually seeking a new champion. Will Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. become such a champion? I believe so — at least as far as the Democratic primary process is concerned.

When that process is final and all the votes from the primaries and caucuses have been tabulated, I believe Kennedy will emerge as the Democratic nominee for president in 2024.

Cue the laughter and pejoratives. Most from the left. Some from the right. In our increasingly polarized times, everything seems to be viewed through the prisms of ideology, tribalism, anger, hate and the outright dismissal of voices in opposition to our own. But if we choose to put down those often-distorted prisms and open our eyes, there are still facts, figures and pragmatic reasons as to why the less obvious (or the most ridiculed) might still be the correct answer.

My first reason for predicting a Kennedy nomination is that I am still not convinced President Joe Biden will actually run for reelection, primarily because of concerns regarding his advanced age and the perception of cognitive decline.

With regard to Biden’s age being a roadblock to a 2024 campaign, we have this from former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, who was asked about it at the Financial Times Weekend Festival: “His age is an issue. And people have every right to consider it.”

In a Quinnipiac poll out this week, 65 percent of voters said they think Biden, 80, is too old for a second term. That’s a share that could very well continue to rise.

But for the moment, Biden has declared his intention to run for reelection. And therein lies reason number two why I believe Kennedy will be the eventual nominee. The longer Biden stays in the race, the more he hurts the chances of undeclared Democratic contenders such as Vice President Kamala Harris, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg or even former First Lady Michelle Obama.

As Biden lets other potential candidates twist in the wind, Kennedy continues to crisscross the nation taking almost every media opportunity given to him — even and especially those on the right, such as Fox News and the New York Post.

Of course, one of the reasons Kennedy is appearing on conservative outlets is because many in the now-activist mainstream media refuse to give him a platform.

Back in 1975 and 1976, when former Georgia Gov. Jimmy Carter ran his longshot campaign for the White House, some in the media also refused to give him a platform. But they did so because they ignorantly dismissed his campaign as a joke, not because they were personally or ideologically opposed to his policies.

Today, many in the media refuse to have Kennedy on because they are outraged that he dared to question the lockdowns, masking and vaccine mandates that came in the wake of the COVID-19 virus. Additionally, I believe many of them are simply running interference for the Biden White House.

But again, there is a real danger in viewing the political process with ideological blinders permanently attached to your face. Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch recently used a statement in a lawsuit over the Title 42 public health order to give a scathing overview of how civil liberties were trampled during the COVID era.

The U.S., he wrote, may “have experienced the greatest intrusions on civil liberties in the peacetime history of this country….Executive officials across the country issued emergency decrees on a breathtaking scale. Governors and local leaders imposed lockdown orders forcing people to remain in their homes. They shuttered businesses and schools, public and private. They closed churches even as they allowed casinos and other favored businesses to carry on. They threatened violators not just with civil penalties but with criminal sanctions too.”

Many on the left now condemning Kennedy as an “anti-vaxxer” might have no problem with these draconian actions. But guess what? Tens of millions of Americans did and still do.

These Americans are going to be very open to hearing Kennedy’s voice as he barnstorms the nation in the face of a liberal media blackout.

The next reason why I believe Kennedy will prevail is that he is far from the “one issue” candidate some in the media believe him to be. He is speaking to multiple issues a majority of voters want addressed — issues which have been upending their quality of life for years.

Kennedy’s “ace in the hole” may very well be his simplified campaign message: “Tell the truth.” He pledges to roll up his sleeves much like his dad did in the 1960s and engage in honest conversations with the people.

Next, because of the Kennedy name coupled with his own stated values, RFK Jr. will make tremendous inroads with Black, Hispanic and disenfranchised voters — a large part of the Democratic base.

After Kennedy met with the editorial board of the New York Post, the editors wrote: “Kennedy has real conviction and charisma, and he’s fiercely independent of many of the party’s reigning pieties — all of which should appeal.”

His message should most especially appeal considering the latest Monmouth University poll declaring that only 16 percent of respondents said the U.S. is headed in the right direction.

Sixteen percent.

The headline for that Post editorial read: “Biden’s a fool to ignore the RFK Jr. challenge.” To that list of “fools” I would add the activist media and the Democratic Party. Despise him all you want, but Kennedy is already polling at 20 percent against Biden as his pragmatic voice continues to reach more and more Americans in search of a champion.
Let's hope...

User avatar
SteveFoerster
Posts: 5924
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:17 pm
Location: Probably DCA or DOM
Contact:

Re: RFK Jr

Post by SteveFoerster » Sun May 28, 2023 11:19 am

This is a Republican operative pushing RFK, Jr. as a way to weaken Biden, nothing more.
Writer, technologist, educator, gadfly.
President of New World University: https://newworld.ac

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 12533
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: RFK Jr

Post by Sertorio » Sun May 28, 2023 11:22 am

SteveFoerster wrote:
Sun May 28, 2023 11:19 am
This is a Republican operative pushing RFK, Jr. as a way to weaken Biden, nothing more.
Douglas MacKinnon was press secretary to former Senator Bob Dole. He is also a former White House and Pentagon official. Mr. MacKinnon grew up on welfare and was homeless a number of times as a child and has fought for those near or below the poverty line for most of his adult life.

https://www.huffpost.com/author/douglas-mackinnon
A typical Republican...

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 12533
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: RFK Jr

Post by Sertorio » Wed May 31, 2023 7:34 am

Biden Has a Kennedy Problem
By James Freeman - May 30, 2023 5:33 pm ET
https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-has- ... lead_pos11

President Joe Biden enjoys strong support among members of the Kennedy family, and perhaps especially among those members of the Kennedy clan who work for him. The problem is that one of those who doesn’t is presenting a formidable challenge to the White House and it’s not clear what the president can do about it.

A new poll from Echelon Insights finds that likely voters have a remarkably positive view of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the kooky environmental lawyer who is challenging Mr. Biden for the Democratic presidential nomination. In fact the Echelon survey suggests that Mr. Kennedy may have the best nationwide favorability rating of any politician in the country. Perhaps it’s no surprise given his name and family history that Mr. Kennedy is extremely well known, but the relative paucity of people with an unfavorable view is striking among current politicians.

In the Echelon poll, 44% of survey respondents view Mr. Kennedy favorably, just 4 percentage points better than the 40% who have a similar opinion of Mr. Biden. But while a full 58% of likely voters have an unfavorable view of the president, only 22% have such low regard for Mr. Kennedy.

The contrast is almost as stark when one compares Mr. Kennedy with the Democratic Party as a whole. Mr. Kennedy and the party he seeks to lead are both viewed favorably by 44% of likely voters in the Echelon survey. But those with an unfavorable view of the party are more than twice as numerous as those who hold an unfavorable view of Mr. Kennedy.

Yes, it’s just one poll and polling is not an exact science, if it’s even a science. But this comes in the wake of many other recent surveys showing surprising Kennedy strength and continuing Biden weakness. The president’s approval rating has fallen to its lowest level of the year in the RealClearPolitics average of polls—with those disapproving of his performance in office outnumbering approvers by more than 13 percentage points.

Given the many Americans who keep telling pollsters they have concerns about Mr. Biden’s mental acuity and policies, some may view Mr. Kennedy as a mere vehicle to express dissatisfaction with the president or a sort of placeholder until an accomplished governor decides to challenge Mr. Biden for the nomination. But Mr. Kennedy is not running a generic Democratic campaign. He‘s highlighting support for civil liberties and opposition to war and the national security apparatus—issues that used to resonate among Democratic voters and may be doing so again.

Richard Allyn reports for CBS affiliate KFMB on Mr. Kennedy’s Memorial Day speech in San Diego, in which he echoed his uncle John F. Kennedy:

“The most important way for us to honor the men and women who gave their lives for our country is to protect the rights that they died to give us,” Kennedy said.

Kennedy said that he is concerned Americans are in danger of losing some of those rights that are guaranteed under the Constitution.

“I feel like I am losing my country. I feel like my party has gone off the rails,” Kennedy told CBS 8.

“It’s become the party of war, and the Democratic party was always skeptical about war,” he added. “It’s become the party of censorship, which is antithetical to the definition and tradition of liberalism.”...

“The Covid lockdown... what they supported was a war on the poor, a war on minorities... this country really suffered deeply during that period,” he said.

If he’s sounding like he’s beginning to make some sense here, Mr. Kennedy can also boast a long history of dubious environmental claims and ill-informed anti-corporate harangues, so there’s a lot for leftist voters to like. After Mr. Kennedy’s recent visit to the New York Post, the paper editorialized on his burgeoning campaign:

It’ll be a serious challenge, if the Democratic establishment and its media allies can’t quash him.
Kennedy has real conviction and charisma, and he’s fiercely independent of many of the party’s reigning pieties — all of which should appeal.

The problem for Team Biden is that if polls continue to show strong support for Mr. Kennedy—and also decent support for the other Democratic challenger, self-help guru Marianne Williamson—Mr. Biden will eventually have to debate them. But unlike a typically competent incumbent, Mr. Biden may not have the ability to attack the two inexperienced politicians and create doubts about their fitness for the job.

This column noted last month:

It’s Joe Biden’s weakness that is inviting Democratic voters to consider such alternatives... What’s also unsettling for the White House is that if Mr. Biden is unable to execute on his strategy of ducking debates and somehow ends up on a stage with the fringe rivals, he could easily come off as the strangest of the three.

Regardless of the preferences of the Democratic establishment, many Democratic voters are still not accepting the idea that they’re stuck with Joe Biden.
In a couple of months we will start seeing that RFK Jr can indeed become the next POTUS. It would be good for the US and for the rest of us worldwide.

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 12533
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: RFK Jr

Post by Sertorio » Fri Jun 02, 2023 2:54 am

Debate Us, Mr. President
by Marianne Williamson - 5/31/23 AT 6:41 AM EDT
https://www.newsweek.com/debate-us-mr-p ... on-1803545

When I was growing up, presidential primaries were where the voters weighed in on who they chose to be a party's nominee. The role of the political party was to stand back until the people had made their decision, then use its power afterwards to help the nominee win the general election.

But that was then, and this is now.

Today, the institutional power of political parties is used not only to rally the voters, but in many ways to determine the candidates. Critical questions about the future of our country are decided by essentially a handful of political operatives, a political-media-industrial elite who present themselves as arbiters of wisdom and protectors of the common good.

They believe in the power of democracy; they just don't want to facilitate it. In fact, they're not above thwarting it when it might challenge their own power or lay bare some inconvenient truths about how this country operates. They don't really think the people can be relied upon to make their own decisions about pretty much anything, least of all who should be president of the United States.

And that is where we are today, as the Democratic National Committee has decided that President Biden will be the nominee of the Democratic Party in 2024, therefore any further mutterings such as, "Hey, wait, shouldn't we have debates?" should cease.

Biden officials and their minions have used mainstream news platforms to spread the word far and wide: There will be no debates, nor any further discussion about it. Candidates other than the chosen one anointed by the DNC should take their toys and go home now. We're supposed to consider any candidates other than President Biden mere political children, and the adults in charge now consider this subject closed.

The problem is that real adults do not cut child poverty by half but then six months later fail to make permanent the tax credit that produced the cut.

Real adults would have codified Roe v. Wade when they had the chance and would do whatever they could do right now to reduce the serious harm being done to women around the country due to draconian anti-abortion laws.

Real adults would have gotten rid of the debt ceiling when they had the chance.

Real adults would recognize that people's lives are falling apart on their watch—from lack of health care, lack of housing, lack of child care, and lack of a living wage—in ways these faux adults have failed to address.

Real adults do not cave to Big Oil and ramp up fossil fuel production at the very time when the survival of the species depends on ramping it down.

Real adults do not acquiesce to the demands of insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, Big Oil, or defense contractors while putting up only a performative fight.

And real lovers of democracy would not believe they have the right to simply shoehorn a candidate into the nomination for president because, well, for no other reason than that they think it's best.

We're told we've progressed, that things are not like they were 100 years ago, that the DNC is not a group of men sitting around a table, smoking cigars, feeling themselves entitled to decide who the nominee will be. But it pretty much is: They are a modern embodiment of the arrogance of power we were warned about by President George Washington, who said in his Farewell Address, "Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally."

Why was Washington afraid of the "baneful effects" of political parties? Because he felt they weakened our democracy. Washington was concerned that "the alternate domination" of one party over another and the parties' inherent tendency to exact revenge upon those who get in their way "is itself a frightful despotism."

George was right.

This is not a time in our history to withhold choice from the electorate; people should be exposed to as wide an array of options for who should lead this country as come forward—not just from those who have enough money or institutional support to get their voices heard. It is not a time to try to force a stale and status-quo politics down our throats, when people know that what we're doing now isn't working. This is not a time in our history for government to deny the majority of Americans our rights to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" in ways afforded to the citizens of every other advanced democracy—be it through health care, cost-free tuition to college and technical school, free childcare, paid family leave, or guaranteed sick pay or a living wage.

This is not a time to pretend that a rematch of Biden and Trump will not make voters stay home in droves. The people have a right to hear from other candidates, with other ideas. This is not a time in our history for people to acquiesce to any form of control over things that will affect our lives and the lives of our children.

Candidate suppression is a form of voter suppression, and the party that purports to be the champion of democracy should not be so wary of it in our own house. The best way to protect our democracy is through practicing it. The DNC does not have the right to determine who's "qualified" for president, when all that really means is who in their mind is qualified to perpetuate the system as it is.

The Democratic Party must allow President Biden to debate his opponents. The fate of our democracy is at stake, and only more democracy can save it.
I decided to place here this opinion article by Marianne Williamson because I believe Robert F. Kennedy would gladly subscribe to what she says. If the Democratic Party is truly democratic, it must promote debates with all candidates. But, of course, they are scared to death of the probable performance of Biden in such debates...

Post Reply