Tulsi Gabbard

Discussion of current events
Jim the Moron
Posts: 1781
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Wed Nov 20, 2019 1:36 pm

Doc wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:28 am
Milo wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:00 pm
Doc wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:50 am
Sertorio wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:41 am
Doc wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:16 am
Jim the Moron wrote:
Mon Nov 18, 2019 9:31 pm
"Tulsi Gabbard Destroys Her Campaign"
https://pjmedia.com/election/tulsi-gabb ... d-by-love/

"There's literally no chance of someone like Tulsi - decent, unifying, brave - winning [the Democrat Party's] nomination."
OK, so far so good, but that's where it all went wrong:

"The problem is our politics has been so poisoned and tainted for so long by those who are only interested in their own political power, their selfish interests or lining their pockets, and using fear and hatred and bigotry to divide us for their own personal gain that they don't know what this looks like. They don't understand what the power of the people feels like. They think that they have the power but they have forgotten that really, the power lies within our hands."

And she made it even worse:

"When we come together and stand united, not motivated by fear, not motivated by hatred, not motivated by racism or bigotry, but motivated by love. Motivated by love. Motivated by love for our country and for each other and for our planet and for our future. When we stand united in this love, there is no obstacle we cannot overcome."
A clear message that won't win her any hearts and minds in the Washington Establishment.
Too bad. I guess that I and lots of other people around the world could become reconciled with the US if Tulsi was to become the next POTUS. But I suppose lots of Americans could care less...
If they couldn't care less it would be because the establishment left wing in the US made sure the only thing people heard of Gabbard is that she is a "Russian asset"
It seems the Russians are doing a good job of that too. And certain white nationalists have endorsed her.

The question is, are they doing it to support her or to ruin her chances?
Hillary is going to show up at the second Ballot of the DNC convention and say "Here I am"
Exactly. There's a likely possibility that the Dem convention will be brokered.. But in the 2nd round, when the super-delegates come into play, will they stick with a known corrupt loser (Hillary)? Or with some far-left candidate doomed to go down in flames vs Trump? Or with a sane, electable candidate like Gabbard? Entertaining stuff.

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 4005
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Thu Nov 21, 2019 11:30 am

Jim the Moron wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 1:36 pm
Doc wrote:
Wed Nov 20, 2019 11:28 am
Milo wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 5:00 pm
Doc wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 11:50 am
Sertorio wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:41 am
Doc wrote:
Tue Nov 19, 2019 10:16 am




A clear message that won't win her any hearts and minds in the Washington Establishment.
Too bad. I guess that I and lots of other people around the world could become reconciled with the US if Tulsi was to become the next POTUS. But I suppose lots of Americans could care less...
If they couldn't care less it would be because the establishment left wing in the US made sure the only thing people heard of Gabbard is that she is a "Russian asset"
It seems the Russians are doing a good job of that too. And certain white nationalists have endorsed her.

The question is, are they doing it to support her or to ruin her chances?
Hillary is going to show up at the second Ballot of the DNC convention and say "Here I am"
Exactly. There's a likely possibility that the Dem convention will be brokered.. But in the 2nd round, when the super-delegates come into play, will they stick with a known corrupt loser (Hillary)? Or with some far-left candidate doomed to go down in flames vs Trump? Or with a sane, electable candidate like Gabbard? Entertaining stuff.
After last nights performance Biden is done. People were actually laughing at him. These debates have been a disaster for the candidates but I think they were set up to make sure only the establishment approved candidates are the front runners and none of the front runners are capable of beating Trump. I am getting pretty sure this was all to benefit Hillary who has a track record of being very bad at running in primaries.
“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Sertorio » Sat Nov 23, 2019 2:35 am

Tulsi 1.JPG
Tulsi 1.JPG (32.24 KiB) Viewed 650 times

One can see why some people in the US are afraid of her. She is smart!... :D

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1781
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Sun Nov 24, 2019 4:57 am

"The Democratic Ticket Trump Doesn't Want To See In 2020"
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/47 ... nt-in-2020

They've got this backwards. Rep Gabbard should head the ticket. Mayor Pete is just another lefty opportunist.

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 4005
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Sun Nov 24, 2019 6:59 pm

Jim the Moron wrote:
Sun Nov 24, 2019 4:57 am
"The Democratic Ticket Trump Doesn't Want To See In 2020"
https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/47 ... nt-in-2020

They've got this backwards. Rep Gabbard should head the ticket. Mayor Pete is just another lefty opportunist.
Bloomberg jumped into the race today. His plan is to spend a lot of money in the primaries and prevent a second ballot at the convention with himself the nominee.
Basically Hillary kept the DNC cash poor. Figuring that the DNC was under her control because she can raise the money. Which in effect has been the case. Bloomberg has lots of money and he doesn't have to raise it from anyone. Plus because of his gun control organizing and funding he has a political organization on the ground.

The other part of this is just one group raised $140 million for democrat candidates outside of the democratic party. Of that number more than half was contributed by just 3 individuals. One kicked in $51 million dollars.


Which says to me that the Democrat party is breaking apart. The DNC establishment has no where else to go. If they form a new party they won't have the votes to be a national party. If the left breaks away and forms it own party same deal. Hence impeaching Trump to mollify the left is the only thing they could do even though Trump is not going to be removed and odds of a sever backlash against the DNC by voters angry at the huge waste of time.

The DNC Establishment, including most of the MSM, let the cultural "Not my president" revolution dogs out, and now those dogs are turning on them.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/ ... rc404=true

So anyone to the right of Obama is now a "republican" and anyone to the left is in the least an anti DNC establishment Democrat.

Gabbard may have a chance to get the nomination. With bloomberg and Hillary fighting it out she might slip past both. But as always it has been a real long shot. Otherwise I don't think Gabbard has a chance to win the Democrat nomination. In 2020 or 2024
“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1781
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Sat Dec 07, 2019 5:08 am

"Gabbard is thinking long term"
https://foxnews.com/media/dana-loesch-t ... 2020-fight

The only MSM outlet that pays any attention to Rep Gabbard is Fox. And that is surprising, given her past support for the Socialist Sen Bernie.

There are rumors floating around that Rep Gabbard might accept a place in a Trump cabinet, should he be reelected. Indications:

1. As Doc points out, she is a long-shot for the 2020 Dem nomination.
2. She has declared that she won't run in the 2020 election for her current Hawaii seat.
3. Her non-intervention views in foreign affairs run counter to current Dem leadership.

As I mentioned before, Tulsi Gabbard reminds me a lot of the late Dem Scoop Jackson. Her left-wing politics are much the same. And, as it happens, Scoop always supported Dem candidates. That never deterred Republican presidents from offering Jackson cabinet positions of Sec of State and Sec of Defense. (He rejected them, preferring to keep his powerful positions in the Senate.)

User avatar
Milo
Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:14 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Milo » Sat Dec 07, 2019 6:44 am

Jim the Moron wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2019 5:08 am
"Gabbard is thinking long term"
https://foxnews.com/media/dana-loesch-t ... 2020-fight

The only MSM outlet that pays any attention to Rep Gabbard is Fox. And that is surprising, given her past support for the Socialist Sen Bernie.

There are rumors floating around that Rep Gabbard might accept a place in a Trump cabinet, should he be reelected. Indications:

1. As Doc points out, she is a long-shot for the 2020 Dem nomination.
2. She has declared that she won't run in the 2020 election for her current Hawaii seat.
3. Her non-intervention views in foreign affairs run counter to current Dem leadership.

As I mentioned before, Tulsi Gabbard reminds me a lot of the late Dem Scoop Jackson. Her left-wing politics are much the same. And, as it happens, Scoop always supported Dem candidates. That never deterred Republican presidents from offering Jackson cabinet positions of Sec of State and Sec of Defense. (He rejected them, preferring to keep his powerful positions in the Senate.)
Why would anyone want a position in a Trump cabinet?

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1781
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Sat Dec 07, 2019 7:39 am

Milo wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2019 6:44 am
Jim the Moron wrote:
Sat Dec 07, 2019 5:08 am
"Gabbard is thinking long term"
https://foxnews.com/media/dana-loesch-t ... 2020-fight

The only MSM outlet that pays any attention to Rep Gabbard is Fox. And that is surprising, given her past support for the Socialist Sen Bernie.

There are rumors floating around that Rep Gabbard might accept a place in a Trump cabinet, should he be reelected. Indications:

1. As Doc points out, she is a long-shot for the 2020 Dem nomination.
2. She has declared that she won't run in the 2020 election for her current Hawaii seat.
3. Her non-intervention views in foreign affairs run counter to current Dem leadership.

As I mentioned before, Tulsi Gabbard reminds me a lot of the late Dem Scoop Jackson. Her left-wing politics are much the same. And, as it happens, Scoop always supported Dem candidates. That never deterred Republican presidents from offering Jackson cabinet positions of Sec of State and Sec of Defense. (He rejected them, preferring to keep his powerful positions in the Senate.)
Why would anyone want a position in a Trump cabinet?
Good question. Talk about your kiss of death . . .

There is talk about Sec Pompeo leaving State to run for the Senate. Would be a wise move on his part.

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 4005
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Thu Dec 12, 2019 4:03 am

“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 3268
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Sertorio » Thu Dec 12, 2019 4:26 am

Doc wrote:
Thu Dec 12, 2019 4:03 am
It is most unfortunate that the overwhelming majority of Americans do not realize what is proven in this video. And they risk ignoring people who could become outstanding POTUS. To think that Hillary Clinton has a better chance of becoming POTUS than Tulsi Gabbard, is truly frightening.

Post Reply