Tulsi Gabbard

Discussion of current events
Jim the Moron
Posts: 1828
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Sun Jan 26, 2020 8:42 pm

Jim the Moron wrote:
Sun Jan 26, 2020 10:59 am
More evidence that the fix is in . . .

"Everybody knows the Establishment hates Rep.Tulsi Gabbard."
https://washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/ ... si-gabbard

CNN dirty tricks . . .
Is the fix in on the Tulsi thread here, too? Seems as if we have folks discussing all sorts of things unrelated to Rep Gabbard. But not to worry - I'll continue to keep things on the straight and narrow here.

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 4268
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Fri Feb 21, 2020 9:50 pm

https://fortune.com/2020/02/21/tulsi-ga ... peachment/
Tulsi Gabbard: How Democrats’ impeachment campaign helped Trump
By
Tulsi Gabbard

February 21, 2020 10:42 AM EST
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard giving a public speech
Democrats’ failed impeachment campaign helped President Donald Trump, writes Rep. Tulsi Gabbard.Courtesy of Tulsi Gabbard campaign

Donald Trump must be defeated: Another four years of him as president would be a disaster. Unfortunately, as I warned, the Democrats’ hyper-partisan impeachment process has increased the likelihood that he will be re-elected. After Trump’s acquittal in the Senate, his approval rating reached the highest levels since he took office. And the risk that he will win in November is much greater than before.

This was entirely foreseeable.

For years I have stressed the need for our leaders to make decisions based on thoughtfulness and foresight—not just emotion, or what may “feel good” in a given moment. This is especially important in the area of foreign policy, as politicians’ desire to “do something” too often overrides careful consideration of the unintended consequences of the actions they take. Time and time again, their poor judgment has led to worse outcomes in the countries where we recklessly intervene, and for our own country’s national security.

An egregious lack of foresight also led to this counterproductive impeachment of Trump.

Those who wish to lead our country should have had the foresight to know that this result was inevitable. They need to understand that their decisions should not be dictated by what makes them temporarily feel good or look good, but rather by what will be good for the American people. Emotional gratification or political advantage should never determine one’s votes or actions.

I find it strange that the same people who loudly declare that Trump's re-election would be an existential threat to our country nonetheless advocated for the very thing which has increased the chances he will be re-elected. If they really believed that a second Trump term would be such a devastating catastrophe, perhaps they should not have given such a priceless contribution to his re-election campaign.

I am not a genius; I simply had enough common sense to foresee that Trump would be acquitted. And I also used my common sense to predict that Trump would, upon his acquittal, use that as vindication. Unfortunately, common sense is not so common among politicians jockeying for power.

It’s no secret that some presidential candidates believed that being the earliest and most emphatic to demand Trump’s impeachment would profit them politically—and they were right. They did benefit politically by exploiting Democratic voters’ disdain for Trump. But their political gain has been America’s loss.

Of course we've all heard their talking points: "Sometimes you just have to do the right thing." Do they believe that the right thing is to help Trump get re-elected—and now embolden him to act with impunity for the remainder of his tenure in office—even as they claim his re-election would destroy our country, our Constitution, our democracy, and our world?

They say, "We had to do this to protect our Constitution”—but if you increase the likelihood of destroying the country, how is that “protecting our Constitution”?

Some of my Democratic colleagues in the House have argued that this failed endeavor was still justified because Trump will go down in infamy as the third president to be impeached. But that will be cold comfort. While it may warm the heart of a self-serving politician eager for publicity and donations, a footnote in future history books will do nothing to comfort our children and our children's children—who will have to live with the disastrous consequences of another four years of Trump in the White House.

Foresight means being guided always by what is in the best interests of the American people, not what may be in one’s political interest. It means getting past the shallow partisan divides that result in short-sighted thinking, and inflame the kind of tribal animosities that make it far more difficult to get even the most basic things done. That’s why I am running for president—to bring a new era of leadership that moves us beyond this destructive pattern. Because our children deserve better.
“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 3444
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Sertorio » Sat Feb 22, 2020 4:21 am

She may not be a genius, but her common sense is what the US and the rest of us would need. Too bad it's Americans who elect the POTUS!... :lol:

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 4268
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Sat Feb 22, 2020 10:23 am

Sertorio wrote:
Sat Feb 22, 2020 4:21 am
She may not be a genius, but her common sense is what the US and the rest of us would need. Too bad it's Americans who elect the POTUS!... :lol:
Well lets see WHO the rest of the world votes for while the US pays for it(And the rest of the world with lives)

“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 4268
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:58 pm

WOW !!! The Democrats could have had a Major nominee for POTUS!!



A candidate with a moral compass.
“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1828
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:28 pm

Doc wrote:
Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:58 pm
WOW !!! The Democrats could have had a Major nominee for POTUS!!



A candidate with a moral compass.

Normally I don't vote in the cut-and-dried primaries here, but this year I'll be picking up a Dem ballot to cast a vote for Rep Gabbard. Of course it will be meaningless - but hang on, folks, for the convention.

User avatar
Sertorio
Posts: 3444
Joined: Fri Dec 16, 2016 3:12 am

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Sertorio » Sat Feb 29, 2020 4:33 am

Jim the Moron wrote:
Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:28 pm
Doc wrote:
Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:58 pm
WOW !!! The Democrats could have had a Major nominee for POTUS!!



A candidate with a moral compass.

Normally I don't vote in the cut-and-dried primaries here, but this year I'll be picking up a Dem ballot to cast a vote for Rep Gabbard. Of course it will be meaningless - but hang on, folks, for the convention.
If Bernie becomes the candidate of the Democrats, I could very well see Tulsi as his running mate. And what a strong ticket that would be! [I know, I know, It's just wishful thinking on my part...]

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1828
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Sat Feb 29, 2020 4:57 am

Sertorio wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 4:33 am
Jim the Moron wrote:
Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:28 pm
Doc wrote:
Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:58 pm
WOW !!! The Democrats could have had a Major nominee for POTUS!!



A candidate with a moral compass.

Normally I don't vote in the cut-and-dried primaries here, but this year I'll be picking up a Dem ballot to cast a vote for Rep Gabbard. Of course it will be meaningless - but hang on, folks, for the convention.
If Bernie becomes the candidate of the Democrats, I could very well see Tulsi as his running mate. And what a strong ticket that would be! [I know, I know, It's just wishful thinking on my part...]

It's being talked about over here, too, Sertorio - e.g. by the conservative Cavuto (Fox news).

User avatar
Doc
Posts: 4268
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm
Location: Cradle To Grave

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Doc » Sat Feb 29, 2020 10:13 am

Jim the Moron wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 4:57 am
Sertorio wrote:
Sat Feb 29, 2020 4:33 am
Jim the Moron wrote:
Fri Feb 28, 2020 5:28 pm
Doc wrote:
Thu Feb 27, 2020 9:58 pm
WOW !!! The Democrats could have had a Major nominee for POTUS!!



A candidate with a moral compass.

Normally I don't vote in the cut-and-dried primaries here, but this year I'll be picking up a Dem ballot to cast a vote for Rep Gabbard. Of course it will be meaningless - but hang on, folks, for the convention.
If Bernie becomes the candidate of the Democrats, I could very well see Tulsi as his running mate. And what a strong ticket that would be! [I know, I know, It's just wishful thinking on my part...]

It's being talked about over here, too, Sertorio - e.g. by the conservative Cavuto (Fox news).
We will have to see what happens on super Tuesday.

If it looks like Bernie wins on the first round at the convention, he can pick anyone he wants. If not, he has to pick(more make a deal with) a running mate that gets him a first round victory. That means he has to pick someone that has enough delegates accumulated to put him over the top in the first round with those additional delegates. If it goes to the second round 15% of the votes will be by superdelegates. 90% of whom will vote for anyone but Bernie.

I can't imagine Biden will make a deal to get his old job back. That leaves Buttegegde, Warren, Bloomberg at this point in time.

Besides that I am not sure they are even going to have a convention due to the coronavirus.
“"I fancied myself as some kind of god....It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.” -- George Soros

Jim the Moron
Posts: 1828
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 9:51 pm

Re: Tulsi Gabbard

Post by Jim the Moron » Thu Mar 05, 2020 11:22 am

Even more evidence that the fix is in . . .

https://trendingpolitics.com/dnc-to-cha ... quirement/
"DNC To Change Debate Rules As Tulsi Gabbard Reaches Delegate Requirement"

Post Reply