Thorium Nuclear Power

is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. Add your contributions here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Milo
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:14 pm

Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by Milo » Wed Dec 21, 2016 1:38 am

Undoubtedly many of you remember my enthusiasm for this topic from elsewhere but I wanted to put a pin in it here.

For those of you who haven't heard of the potential of Thorium nuclear energy, here is a primer on what is generally considered the most viable technology to utilize it, Liquid Floride Thorium Reactors.

https://youtu.be/uK367T7h6ZY

In my view there is little to report since that video. Nobody has started such a reactor yet. I hope that soon someone will at least give this technology a chance to fail.

User avatar
SteveFoerster
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:17 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA and Dominica, West Indies
Contact:

Re: Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by SteveFoerster » Wed Dec 21, 2016 9:00 pm

Milo wrote:In my view there is little to report since that video. Nobody has started such a reactor yet. I hope that soon someone will at least give this technology a chance to fail.
Agreed. And even if it took a bit of effort to make it work that seems like a much better use of research funds than fusion.
Writer, technologist, educator, gadfly.
President of New World University: http://newworld.ac

Doc
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by Doc » Thu Dec 22, 2016 6:29 am

SteveFoerster wrote:
Milo wrote:In my view there is little to report since that video. Nobody has started such a reactor yet. I hope that soon someone will at least give this technology a chance to fail.
Agreed. And even if it took a bit of effort to make it work that seems like a much better use of research funds than fusion.
Fusion has had some advances recently. ITER is set to start running in 2020.

http://www.sciencealert.com/this-14-bil ... sion-power
The classes and the races to weak to master the new conditions of life must give way {..} They must perish in the revolutionary holocaust --Karl Marx

User avatar
Milo
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:14 pm

Re: Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by Milo » Thu Dec 22, 2016 10:32 am

Doc wrote:
SteveFoerster wrote:
Milo wrote:In my view there is little to report since that video. Nobody has started such a reactor yet. I hope that soon someone will at least give this technology a chance to fail.
Agreed. And even if it took a bit of effort to make it work that seems like a much better use of research funds than fusion.
Fusion has had some advances recently. ITER is set to start running in 2020.

http://www.sciencealert.com/this-14-bil ... sion-power
I think everyone agrees that we need to get off hydrocarbons.

Who knows which technology will succeed?

So, it seems obvious to me that there is one characteristic necessary to do so: a technology that will work through the grid. For that, we need a technology capable of delivering high, sustained power. IOW, it's great that individuals choose solar or wind but it is difficult to imagine technologies like that developing in any other way.

So it seems that our best prospects are some kind of nuclear. It seems sensible that fission will yield faster results, as we've already got it working, just not very well.

That being said, I can't imagine bringing either fission or fission to market costing less than the failed multi trillion dollar attempt to turn the ME into middle America but, if we got off hydrocarbons, any real reason for caring about that benighted region will vanish.

So, throw money at nuclear! It can't be more wasteful than what we're doing now.

Doc
Posts: 774
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:09 pm

Re: Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by Doc » Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:28 am

Milo wrote:
Doc wrote:
SteveFoerster wrote:
Milo wrote:In my view there is little to report since that video. Nobody has started such a reactor yet. I hope that soon someone will at least give this technology a chance to fail.
Agreed. And even if it took a bit of effort to make it work that seems like a much better use of research funds than fusion.
Fusion has had some advances recently. ITER is set to start running in 2020.

http://www.sciencealert.com/this-14-bil ... sion-power
I think everyone agrees that we need to get off hydrocarbons.

Who knows which technology will succeed?

So, it seems obvious to me that there is one characteristic necessary to do so: a technology that will work through the grid. For that, we need a technology capable of delivering high, sustained power. IOW, it's great that individuals choose solar or wind but it is difficult to imagine technologies like that developing in any other way.

So it seems that our best prospects are some kind of nuclear. It seems sensible that fission will yield faster results, as we've already got it working, just not very well.

That being said, I can't imagine bringing either fission or fission to market costing less than the failed multi trillion dollar attempt to turn the ME into middle America but, if we got off hydrocarbons, any real reason for caring about that benighted region will vanish.

So, throw money at nuclear! It can't be more wasteful than what we're doing now.
I really don't have a problem with hydro carbons. I do have a problem with importing them however. Currently the US is the largest oil producing country in the world. IF the US had its act together it would use thorium reactors as you mention here or push harder to get fusion done.Wind power is a joke. It will never pay for itself. Solar eventually probably will but without subsidies it is not ready for prime time. We can still product plenty of oil for cars and for export. Natural gas from fracking is great. Lots of things are made from Nat gas It is just not for home heating and cooking. There is enough Nat gas to use it at the current rate for 90 years.
The classes and the races to weak to master the new conditions of life must give way {..} They must perish in the revolutionary holocaust --Karl Marx

User avatar
SteveFoerster
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:17 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA and Dominica, West Indies
Contact:

Re: Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by SteveFoerster » Thu Dec 22, 2016 11:49 am

Milo wrote:So, it seems obvious to me that there is one characteristic necessary to do so: a technology that will work through the grid.
Why?
Writer, technologist, educator, gadfly.
President of New World University: http://newworld.ac

User avatar
Milo
Posts: 448
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 10:14 pm

Re: Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by Milo » Thu Dec 22, 2016 1:43 pm

SteveFoerster wrote:
Milo wrote:So, it seems obvious to me that there is one characteristic necessary to do so: a technology that will work through the grid.
Why?
Because we can't force everyone to get home batteries and solar panels. Even if we could, people wouldn't tolerate any gap in their power supply, which would be inevitable with solar in many regions, if not everywhere. Wind even more so.

There is in theory enough thorium to power the world for centuries, using the same grid as now.

The practical solution is to replace the current grid sources with more sustainable ones, rather than social engineering.

User avatar
SteveFoerster
Posts: 553
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2016 7:17 pm
Location: Northern Virginia, USA and Dominica, West Indies
Contact:

Re: Thorium Nuclear Power

Post by SteveFoerster » Fri Dec 23, 2016 4:41 pm

Milo wrote:
SteveFoerster wrote:
Milo wrote:So, it seems obvious to me that there is one characteristic necessary to do so: a technology that will work through the grid.
Why?
Because we can't force everyone to get home batteries and solar panels. Even if we could, people wouldn't tolerate any gap in their power supply, which would be inevitable with solar in many regions, if not everywhere. Wind even more so.

There is in theory enough thorium to power the world for centuries, using the same grid as now.

The practical solution is to replace the current grid sources with more sustainable ones, rather than social engineering.
Okay, I see. I tend to think of these things from a tropical perspective, but you make a good point that solar doesn't work at high latitudes and wind isn't reliable.
Writer, technologist, educator, gadfly.
President of New World University: http://newworld.ac

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests